Does experience matter? Implications for community consultation for research in emergency settings
- 24 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in AJOB Empirical Bioethics
- Vol. 8 (2) , 75-81
Abstract
Background: Community consultation (CC) is required for research in emergency settings using an exception from informed consent (EFIC) in the United States, but uncertainty persists regarding best CC practices. There is ongoing debate about whom to include in CC, specifically, whether to prioritize geographically defined communities or individuals with connections to the condition. Understanding the impact of personal disease experience on views of EFIC research is important for designing CC and interpreting its results. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of surveys administered to 2612 participants at 12 sites in CC events conducted for ProTECT III: Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, a Phase III, randomized trial conducted using EFIC. Key survey domains included personal traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience, demographic information, and acceptance of both hypothetical personal enrollment under EFIC and the use of EFIC in general in ProTECT III. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were used to explore relationships between key domains. Results: TBI patients, those with family members/loved ones with TBI, and those who knew someone else with TBI were slightly more accepting of hypothetical personal enrollment under EFIC (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.14 [0.78–1.67], 1.54 [1.17–2.02], and 1.51 [1.19–1.92], respectively) and use of EFIC in general (adjusted OR 1.17 [0.83–1.64], 1.39 [1.08–1.77], and 1.06 [0.86–1.31], respectively) than those without this. In a subgroup analysis based on race, white participants with any disease experience had higher levels of acceptance of EFIC, as expected. However, there was numerically lower acceptance of personal and general EFIC enrollment among black participants with closer TBI connections. Conclusions: Personal TBI experience was associated with increased acceptance of EFIC research for that condition, except among black participants. Heterogeneity of the effect of personal disease experience on EFIC views further supports inclusion of individuals with relevant disease experience in CC and highlights the importance of engaging minority participants.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients’ Perspectives of Enrollment in Research Without ConsentCritical Care Medicine, 2015
- Learning From Experience: A Systematic Review of Community Consultation Acceptance DataAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2015
- Consulting Communities When Patients Cannot ConsentCritical Care Medicine, 2014
- Community consultation for prehospital research: experiences of study coordinators and principal investigators.Prehospital Emergency Care, 2014
- Enrollment in research under exception from informed consent: The Patients’ Experiences in Emergency Research (PEER) studyResuscitation, 2013
- Is Emergency Research Without Initial Consent Justified?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2010
- Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consentResuscitation, 2009
- Who will participate in acute stroke trials?Neurology, 2009
- Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: A study of survivors of sudden cardiac deathSocial Science & Medicine, 2009
- Patients' Views on Identifiability of Samples and Informed Consent for Genetic ResearchThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2008