Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity
Authors:
- 1 October 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Women's Health
- Vol. 26 (10) , 1086-1093
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether there were gender differences in likelihood of receiving a first National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 award among 5445 instructors and assistant professors at Harvard Medical School (HMS). Materials and Methods: Data on R01 award principal investigators were obtained from NIH ExPORTER and linked with faculty data. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we examined the association of gender with receipt of first R01 award between 2008 and 2015 accounting for demographics, research productivity metrics, and professional characteristics. Results: Compared to males, females had fewer publications, lower h-index, smaller coauthor networks and were less likely to be assistant professors (p < 0.0001). Four hundred and thirteen of 5445 faculty (7.6%) received their first R01 award during the study period. There was no gender difference in receipt of R01 awards in age-adjusted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70–1.08) or multivariable-adjusted models (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86–1.34). Compared to white males, there was a nonsignificant 10%, 18%, and 30% lower rate of R01 receipt among white, Asian or Pacific Islander, and underrepresented minority females, respectively. These differences were eliminated in the multivariable-adjusted model. Network reach, age, HMS start year, h-index, academic rank, previous K award, terminal degree, and HMS training were all significant predictors of receiving an R01 award. Conclusions: A relatively small proportion of HMS junior faculty obtained their first NIH R01 award during the study period. There was no significant gender difference in likelihood of award. However, we are unable to distinguish faculty that never applied from those who applied and were not successful.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?Academic Medicine, 2016
- Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014JAMA, 2015
- Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical CenterJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2015
- Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature reviewPerspectives on Medical Education, 2014
- Gender Differences in Publication Productivity, Academic Position, Career Duration, and Funding Among U.S. Academic Radiation Oncology FacultyAcademic Medicine, 2014
- Gender Distribution of U.S. Medical School Faculty by Academic Track TypeAcademic Medicine, 2014
- Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physiciansThe Laryngoscope, 2013
- Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School FacultyJournal of Women's Health, 2008
- Separate and Equitable Promotion Tracks for Clinician-EducatorsJAMA, 2005
- Understanding the Careers of Physician Educators in Family MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2001