Detection and prevention of unbalanced bids
Authors:
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Construction Management and Economics
- Vol. 27 (8) , 721-732
Abstract
Unbalanced bidding is a serious problem for the construction owner because it may increase the cost of construction The most common way to mathematically unbalance a bid is frontloading where a bidder overstates the unit price of line items scheduled to be performed early in the project and understates the unit price of line items performed later. A bidder can also overstate the unit price of a line item whose quantity was somehow underrated by the engineer. If the owner proves that a mathematically unbalanced bid costs more to perform, the bid is said to be materially unbalanced, in which case the owner can reject the bid. A model is presented that formalizes and automates the process of detecting mathematically and materially unbalanced bids by comparing line item prices with the engineer’s estimates and the average prices offered by the bidders. This model allows owners to detect and reject unbalanced bids, and deters bidders from unbalancing their bid.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review of Unbalanced Bidding Models in ConstructionJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2007
- Electronic-Based Procedure for Managing Unbalanced BidsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004
- Principles of Applied Civil Engineering Design2004
- Tendering: optimization and rationalityConstruction Management and Economics, 1989
- Unbalanced Highway Contract TenderingJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1974
- TECHNICAL NOTE. UNBALANCING OF TENDERS.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1972
- Unbalanced Bidding Models - TheoryJournal of the Construction Division, 1968