Post-Orthodontic Lower Incisors Recessions: Combined Periodontic and Orthodontic Approach
Open Access
- 2 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (21) , 8060
Abstract
The bonded lingual retainer (BLR) is considered a favorable choice for retaining lower incisors’ alignment post-orthodontic treatment; however, it may cause some unwanted effects such as inadvertent tooth movement and torque changes. These often result in gingival recession (Miller class III-type) with exposure of the root surface, which compromises the esthetics and hinders the comfort of the patient. Fifteen post-orthodontic patients presenting Miller class III-type recessions with BLR were examined. Two protocols were used: the first included the removal of the BLR prior to surgery and the second included only a surgical approach. All patients underwent the same surgery of a modified tunnel double papilla procedure for root coverage. The gingival recession was measured using a dental probe before, and three to six months post-surgery. The average improvement in recession depth was significantly greater (p = 0.008) for the protocol that included removal of the BLR (4.0 ± 0.83 mm) with an improvement of 87.2% as compared to the second protocol that showed an improvement of 43.8% (1.88 ± 1.29 mm). Removing the BLR prior to surgery is beneficial for predictable root coverage in post-orthodontic Miller class III recessions.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability studyJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011
- The Miller classification of gingival recession: limits and drawbacksJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2010
- Mahajan's Modification of the Miller’s Classification for Gingival RecessionDental Hypotheses, 2010
- Root Coverage Esthetic Score: A System to Evaluate the Esthetic Outcome of the Treatment of Gingival Recession Through Evaluation of Clinical CasesJournal of Periodontology, 2009
- Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?Journal of Dentistry, 2008
- Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainersAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007
- Comparative Study of Two Root Coverage Procedures: A 24‐Month Follow‐Up Multicenter StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2006
- Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: A retrospective study of adult orthodontic patientsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005
- A Multicenter Comparative Study of Two Root Coverage Procedures: Coronally Advanced Flap With Addition of Enamel Matrix Proteins and Subpedicle Connective Tissue GraftJournal of Periodontology, 2004
- The Deceptive Nature of Root Coverage ResultsJournal of Periodontology, 2000