Impact of baseline SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on syndromic surveillance and the risk of subsequent COVID-19—a prospective multicenter cohort study
Authors:
Open Access
- 14 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Background: In a prospective healthcare worker (HCW) cohort, we assessed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection according to baseline serostatus. Methods: Baseline serologies were performed among HCW from 23 Swiss healthcare institutions between June and September 2020, before the second COVID-19 wave. Participants answered weekly electronic questionnaires covering information about nasopharyngeal swabs (PCR/rapid antigen tests) and symptoms compatible with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Screening of symptomatic staff by nasopharyngeal swabs was routinely performed in participating facilities. We compared numbers of positive nasopharyngeal tests and occurrence of COVID-19 symptoms between HCW with and without anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Results: A total of 4812 HCW participated, wherein 144 (3%) were seropositive at baseline. We analyzed 107,807 questionnaires with a median follow-up of 7.9 months. Median number of answered questionnaires was similar (24 vs. 23 per person, P = 0.83) between those with and without positive baseline serology. Among 2712 HCW with ≥ 1 SARS-CoV-2 test during follow-up, 3/67 (4.5%) seropositive individuals reported a positive result (one of whom asymptomatic), compared to 547/2645 (20.7%) seronegative participants, 12 of whom asymptomatic (risk ratio [RR] 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07 to 0.66). Seropositive HCWs less frequently reported impaired olfaction/taste (6/144, 4.2% vs. 588/4674, 12.6%, RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15–0.73), chills (19/144, 13.2% vs. 1040/4674, 22.3%, RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.90), and limb/muscle pain (28/144, 19.4% vs. 1335/4674, 28.6%, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.49–0.95). Impaired olfaction/taste and limb/muscle pain also discriminated best between positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 results. Conclusions: Having SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies provides almost 80% protection against SARS-CoV-2 re-infection for a period of at least 8 months.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31CA30_196544, PZ00P3_179919)
- federal office of public health switzerland (20.008218/421-28/1)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care WorkersNew England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Immunity and ReinfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2021
- Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 VaccineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAsClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2020
- Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack RateJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Re-infection by a Phylogenetically Distinct Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Strain Confirmed by Whole Genome SequencingClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Features of anosmia in COVID-19Medecine Et Maladies Infectieuses, 2020
- Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic reviewCritical Care, 2020
- Covid-19: Two antibody tests are “highly specific” but vary in sensitivity, evaluations find2020
- Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19Nature Medicine, 2020