Small-vessel vasculitis surrounding a spared temporal artery: Clinical and pathologic findings in a series of twenty-eight patients
Authors:
- Carme FontCFCarme Font
- Francesc CardellachFCFrancesc Cardellach
- Josep M. GrauJGJosep M. Grau
- Maria C. CidMCMaria C. Cid
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 44 (6) , 1387-1395
Abstract
Occasionally, a temporal artery biopsy reveals small-vessel vasculitis (SVV) surrounding a spared temporal artery, the significance of which is unclear. We analyzed the final diagnosis in a series of patients with this condition and tried to identify histopathologic features with potential usefulness in predicting the ultimate diagnosis. We performed a clinical and histopathologic review of 28 patients in whom SVV surrounding a spared temporal artery was the first histologic finding that led to the diagnosis of vasculitis. For comparison purposes, we analyzed the pattern of small vessel involvement in 30 patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA). GCA was considered the most likely diagnosis in 12 patients, based on the absence of clinical evidence of additional organ involvement and normal findings on muscle biopsy and electrophysiologic study. Three patients had systemic necrotizing vasculitis (SNV), based on the demonstration of typical lesions on subsequent muscle, nerve, or kidney biopsy. After extensive evaluation, 4 patients remained unclassifiable. Nine patients were incompletely studied. Fibrinoid necrosis was significantly more frequent in patients with SNV (P = 0.0022), whereas involvement of vasa vasorum was more frequent in patients classified as having GCA (P = 0.022). No differences in the pattern of small vessel involvement were found in patients with SVV surrounding a spared temporal artery who were classified as having GCA compared with patients with biopsy-proven GCA. Granulocytes were observed at similar frequency in all conditions. SVV may be the only abnormal feature in a temporal artery biopsy and the only histologic evidence of vasculitis. The diagnosis of GCA can be reasonably established in most of these patients when there is no apparent evidence of additional organ involvement. However, when fibrinoid necrosis is observed or the temporal artery vasa vasorum are not involved, SNV must be extensively excluded.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Temporal ArteritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- ICAMs Redistributed by Chemokines to Cellular Uropods as a Mechanism for Recruitment of T LymphocytesJournal of Cell Biology, 1997
- Signaling through CD50 (ICAM‐3) stimulates T lymphocyte binding to human umbilical vein endothelial cells and extracellular matrix proteins via an increase in β1 and β2 integrin functionEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1994
- Wegener's granulomatosis presenting as temporal arteritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1990
- The American college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of polyarteritis nodosaArthritis & Rheumatism, 1990
- Neurologic manifestations of giant cell arteritisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Peripheral neuropathic syndromes in giant cell (temporal) arteritisNeurology, 1988
- Neurologic disease in biopsy‐proven giant cell (temporal) arteritisNeurology, 1988
- Clinical usefulness of temporal artery biopsy.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987