Approaches to Mixed Methods Dissemination and Implementation Research: Methods, Strengths, Caveats, and Opportunities
- 11 April 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Vol. 42 (5) , 508-523
Abstract
Limited translation of research into practice has prompted study of diffusion and implementation, and development of effective methods of encouraging adoption, dissemination and implementation. Mixed methods techniques offer approaches for assessing and addressing processes affecting implementation of evidence-based interventions. We describe common mixed methods approaches used in dissemination and implementation research, discuss strengths and limitations of mixed methods approaches to data collection, and suggest promising methods not yet widely used in implementation research. We review qualitative, quantitative, and hybrid approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation studies, and describe methods for integrating multiple methods to increase depth of understanding while improving reliability and validity of findings.Keywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mixed Method Designs in Implementation ResearchAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Community Mental Health Agencies: A Multiple Stakeholder AnalysisAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2009
- Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled TrialAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Practice-Based Research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH RoadmapJAMA, 2007
- The Role of Formative Evaluation in Implementation Research and the QUERI ExperienceJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Disseminating Innovations in Health CareJAMA, 2003
- The pragmatic randomised controlled trialAdvances in Psychiatric Treatment, 2002
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983