Form and Meaning in the Earliest Cities: A New Approach to Ancient Urban Planning
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Planning History
- Vol. 6 (1) , 3-47
Abstract
This article describes a new model for urban planning in ancient and preindustrial cities that moves beyond the traditional simplistic dichotomy of planned versus organic cities. The model has two components: coordination of buildings and spaces, and standardization among cities. A variety of coordinated arrangements of buildings reflect urban planning, including simple coordination, formality and monumentality, orthogonal layouts, other forms of geometric order, and access and visibility (view-shed). Standardization among cities is analyzed in terms of architectural inventories, spatial patterns, orientation, and metrology. The political and social significance of ancient urban planning is then discussed using Amos Rapoport's model of levels of meaning in the built environment.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Did the Maya Build Architectural Cosmograms?Latin American Antiquity, 2005
- City Size in Late Postclassic MesoamericaJournal of Urban History, 2005
- Reshaping CitiesJournal of Urban History, 2003
- Huitzilopochtli's Conquest: Aztec Ideology in the Archaeological RecordCambridge Archaeological Journal, 1998
- Experiments with Settlement Aggregation ModelsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1997
- Worldview Materialized in Teotihuacan, MexicoLatin American Antiquity, 1993
- Pattern and Meaning in Prehistoric Peruvian Architecture: The Architecture of Social Control in the Chimu StateLatin American Antiquity, 1992
- Settlement Pattern and Chinampa Agriculture at TenochtitlanAmerican Antiquity, 1972
- The Origin and Spread of the Grid-Pattern TownGeographical Review, 1946
- Urbanism as a Way of LifeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1938