Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: A randomized controlled trial
- 1 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Vol. 71 (8) , 1159-1163
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Suture Choice and Other Methods of Skin ClosureSurgical Clinics of North America, 2009
- Sutures and suturing techniques in skin closureIndian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 2009
- The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarringJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2008
- Anxiety and self-consciousness in patients with facial lacerations one week and six months laterBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2006
- Experimental Studies in Swine for Measurement of Suture ExtrusionJournal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2004
- Scar revisionOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 2001
- Comparison of Polydioxanone and Polyglactin 910 in Intradermal RepairPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1996
- Mechanical Comparison of 10 Suture Materials before and after in Vivo IncubationJournal of Surgical Research, 1994
- A comparison of scar quality in wounds closed under tension with PGA (Dexon) and Polydioxanone (PDS)British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1989
- The stretched scar: the benefit of prolonged dermal supportBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1989