Three-dimensional vs Standard Laparoscopy: Comparative Assessment Using a Validated Program for Laparoscopic Urologic Skills
Authors:
- Antonio CicioneACAntonio Cicione
- Riccardo AutorinoRARiccardo Autorino
- Alberto BredaABAlberto Breda
- Marco De SioMSMarco De Sio
- Rocco DamianoRDRocco Damiano
- Ferdinando FuscoFFFerdinando Fusco
- Francesco GrecoFGFrancesco Greco
- Emanuel Carvalho-DiasECEmanuel Carvalho-Dias
- Paulo MotaPMPaulo Mota
- Cristina NogueiraCNCristina Nogueira
- Pedro PinhoPedro Pinho
- Vincenzo MironeVMVincenzo Mirone
- 1 December 2013
- Vol. 82 (6) , 1444-1450
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2D Versus 3D Visualization: Impact on Laparoscopic Proficiency Using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Skill SetJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2012
- Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Imaging Improves Surgical Performance on Standardized Ex-Vivo Laparoscopic TasksJournal of Endourology, 2012
- For 3D laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation: how to get maximum benefit from 3D visionSurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical methodSurgical Endoscopy, 2012
- Program for Laparoscopic Urologic Skills: A Newly Developed and Validated Educational ProgramUrology, 2012
- 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasksSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Rogers and Graham's 1979 PaperPerception, 2009
- Laparoscopic surgery in urologyCurrent Opinion in Urology, 2000
- Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe Lancet, 1998
- Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Video SystemsJournal of Endourology, 1996