Maximal Lactate Steady State Prediction Using Two DMAX Methods in Horses Subjected to Treadmill‐Graded Exercise Test
Authors:
- Thayssa de Oliveira LittiereThayssa de Oliveira Littiere
- Guilherme Barbosa da CostaGCGuilherme Barbosa da Costa
- Nathali Adrielli Agassi de SalesNSNathali Adrielli Agassi de Sales
- Júlia Ribeiro Garcia de CarvalhoJCJúlia Ribeiro Garcia de Carvalho
- Ivan Dario Martinez RodriguezIRIvan Dario Martinez Rodriguez
- Gabriel Vieira RamosGabriel Vieira Ramos
- José Correa de Lacerda‐NetoJLJosé Correa de Lacerda‐Neto
- Guilherme Camargo FerrazGFGuilherme Camargo Ferraz
- 28 November 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
- Vol. 110 (2) , 218-224
Abstract
Maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) and its predictive thresholds, including the lactate threshold (LT), are widely used to estimate endurance capacity, prescribe training, and assess the effects of training. The human literature identified approximately twenty‐five methods to predict the MLSS. This communication compares the concordance between the two D MAX methods and the MLSS. Under laboratory conditions, ten teaching horses underwent a submaximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill to obtain their lactate‐velocity curves (LVC). They performed three to five 30‐min continuous running sessions to determine the MLSS. The traditional D MAX method was determined using the maximal distance from LVC to the line formed by its endpoints. A new calculated D MAX method (D MAXC ) involved mathematically determining the point that results in the maximum distance from a curve connecting the start to the endpoint of the LVC. The agreement among the velocities corresponding to the D MAX (V MAX ), D MAXC (V MAXC ), and the MLSS (V MLSS ) was established using a Bland‐Altman plot and ordinary least products (OLP) analysis. The average lactatemia at V MLSS , V MAX , and V MAXC was 1.50 ± 0.36 mM, 2.02 ± 0.66 mM, and 1.92 ± 0.65 mM, with respective speeds of 5.42 ± 0.57 m/s, 6.42 ± 0.71 m/s, and 6.35 ± 0.66 m/s. The mean difference between V MAX ‐V MLSS and V MAXC ‐V MLSS was ‐1.01 ± 0.61 and ‐0.93 ± 0.67 m/s, respectively. V MAX and V MAXC did not show constant and proportional biases compared to V MLSS . In the GXT protocol used in this current study, D MAX approaches appear to be accurate and reliable methods for lactate threshold determination and estimating MLSS in teaching horses.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating plasma lactate running speed derived parameters for predicting maximal lactate steady state in teaching horsesJournal of Equine Veterinary Science, 2025
- Predicting maximal lactate steady state from lactate thresholds determined using methods based on an incremental exercise test in beagle dogs: A study using univariate and multivariate approachesResearch in Veterinary Science, 2022
- A comprehensive guideline for Bland–Altman and intra class correlation calculations to properly compare two methods of measurement and interpret findingsPhysiological Measurement, 2020
- Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreementTurkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2018
- A modified D-max method to estimate heart rate at a ventilatory threshold during an incremental exercise test2017
- Comparison of Selected Lactate Threshold Parameters with Maximal Lactate Steady State in CyclingInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2013
- Comparison of the lactate minimum speed and the maximal lactate steady state to determine aerobic capacity in purebred Arabian horsesNew Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2013
- Statistical Techniques For Comparing Measurers And Methods Of Measurement: A Critical ReviewClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 2002
- A New Approach for the Determination of Ventilatory and Lactate ThresholdsInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1992
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986