SMART (SiMulAtion and ReconsTruction) PET: an efficient PET simulation-reconstruction tool
Open Access
- 18 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in EJNMMI Physics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-18
Abstract
Positron-emission tomography (PET) simulators are frequently used for development and performance evaluation of segmentation methods or quantitative uptake metrics. To date, most PET simulation tools are based on Monte Carlo simulations, which are computationally demanding. Other analytical simulation tools lack the implementation of time of flight (TOF) or resolution modelling (RM). In this study, a fast and easy-to-use PET simulation-reconstruction package, SiMulAtion and ReconsTruction (SMART)-PET, is developed and validated, which includes both TOF and RM. SMART-PET, its documentation and instructions to calibrate the tool to a specific PET/CT system are available on Zenodo. SMART-PET allows the fast generation of 3D PET images. As input, it requires one image representing the activity distribution and one representing the corresponding CT image/attenuation map. It allows the user to adjust different parameters, such as reconstruction settings (TOF/RM), noise level or scan duration. Furthermore, a random spatial shift can be included, representing patient repositioning. To evaluate the tool, simulated images were compared with real scan data of the NEMA NU 2 image quality phantom. The scan was acquired as a 60-min list-mode scan and reconstructed with and without TOF and/or RM. For every reconstruction setting, ten statistically equivalent images, representing 30, 60, 120 and 300 s scan duration, were generated. Simulated and real-scan data were compared regarding coefficient of variation in the phantom background and activity recovery coefficients (RCs) of the spheres. Furthermore, standard deviation images of each of the ten statistically equivalent images were compared. SMART-PET produces images comparable to actual phantom data. The image characteristics of simulated and real PET images varied in similar ways as function of reconstruction protocols and noise levels. The change in image noise with variation of simulated TOF settings followed the theoretically expected behaviour. RC as function of sphere size agreed within 0.3–11% between simulated and actual phantom data. SMART-PET allows for rapid and easy simulation of PET data. The user can change various acquisition and reconstruction settings (including RM and TOF) and noise levels. The images obtained show similar image characteristics as those seen in actual phantom data.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of regularization in motion compensated PET image reconstruction: a realistic numerical 4D simulation studyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2013
- Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysisEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Fast generation of 4D PET-MR data from real dynamic MR acquisitionsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2011
- Impact of [18F]FDG PET imaging parameters on automatic tumour delineation: need for improved tumour delineation methodologyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011
- Measuring response to therapy using FDG PET: semi-quantitative and full kinetic analysisEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011
- Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncologyEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010
- PeneloPET, a Monte Carlo PET simulation tool based on PENELOPE: features and validationPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2009
- Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATEPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2006
- Time of flight in PET revisitedIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2003
- PETSIM: Monte Carlo simulation of all sensitivity and resolution parameters of cylindrical positron imaging systemsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1992