Percutaneous Removal of Renal and Ureteral Calculi: Experience with 400 Cases
Authors:
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 134 (4) , 662-665
Abstract
Percutaneous removal of renal and ureteral calculi was performed in 500 patients since 1979. Experience with our first 100 cases enabled us to accumulate a variety of techniques. We report our experience with the subsequent 400 cases. As judged by plain films of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, and renal tomograms without contrast medium we attained a status free of stones in 99 per cent of the patients with renal and 94.5 per cent with ureteral calculi. Intravenous-assisted local anesthesia was used in 94 per cent of the cases. There was no mortality and the incidence of complications was low. Most patients with renal and ureteral calculi can be managed successfully and safely by percutaneous methods with good patient tolerance and minimal convalescence.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Management of Ureteral Calculi Facilitated by Retrograde Flushing with Carbon Dioxide or Diluted Radiopaque DyeJournal of Urology, 1985
- Percutaneous extraction of urinary calculi: use of the intercostal approach.Radiology, 1985
- Percutaneous Removal of Caliceal and Other “Inaccessible” Stones: Instruments and TechniquesJournal of Urology, 1984
- A logical approach to renal stone removalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Extraction of Renal and Ureteral Calculi from 100 PatientsJournal of Urology, 1984
- Flexible Fiberoptic and Rigid-Rod Lens Endoscopy of the Lower Urinary Tract: A Prospective Controlled ComparisonJournal of Urology, 1984
- Recurrent Urolithiasis following Anatrophic NephrolithotomyJournal of Urology, 1981
- Reconstructive Renal Surgery Following Anatrophic Nephrolithotomy: Followup of 100 Consecutive CasesJournal of Urology, 1974
- RECURRENCE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS FOR UPPER URINARY TRACT STONE1British Journal of Urology, 1954