Safety and effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza treatment, prophylaxis, and outbreak control: a systematic review of systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
- 22 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 72 (11) , 2990-3007
Abstract
To review evidence from systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses (SR/MAs) regarding neuraminidase inhibitor (NI) safety and effectiveness. We conducted an SR of SR/MAs of randomized control and/or observational studies. We searched eight electronic databases for SR/MAs that examined the effectiveness or safety of NIs administered for influenza (i.e. influenza-like illness or lab-confirmed) treatment or prophylaxis. We identified 27 (0.7%) eligible SR/MAs of 3723 articles reviewed. NI (n = 2) or oseltamivir (n = 1) versus no treatment were consistently associated with a decrease in mortality odds among the hospitalized, general population (OR range 0.2 − 0.8). Oseltamivir versus no treatment was associated with a decrease in hospitalization and pneumonia risk/odds in 2/4 SR/MAs. Oseltamivir (n = 4) and zanamivir (n = 3) were consistently associated with a 0.5 − 1 day decrease in symptom duration. Oseltamivir (n = 4) or zanamivir (n = 4) versus no prophylaxis were consistently associated with a decrease in the odds/risk of symptomatic secondary transmission (OR/RR range 0.1 − 0.5). Oseltamivir versus no treatment was consistently associated with a 1.5- to 2.5-fold increase in the odds/risk of nausea (n = 4) and vomiting (n = 5). NI treatment is likely to be effective at reducing mortality among hospitalized patients, and symptom duration by up to 1 day in the general population. Oseltamivir or zanamivir prophylaxis are likely to be effective at reducing secondary symptomatic influenza transmission. Increased nausea and vomiting are likely associated with oseltamivir use. We recommend that decisions regarding NI use are made in consideration of potential adverse events, particularly for the general population at low risk of complications. Among hospitalized patients, NI administration seems warranted to reduce mortality risk.Keywords
Funding Information
- Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in situations of pandemic and/or novel/variant influenza: a systematic review of the literature, 2009–15Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2017
- Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 2015
- Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions About Neuraminidase Inhibitors for InfluenzaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2014
- Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients admitted to hospital with influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection: a meta-analysis of individual participant dataThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2014
- The Value of Neuraminidase Inhibitors for the Prevention and Treatment of Seasonal Influenza: A Systematic Review of Systematic ReviewsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Effectiveness of oseltamivir in adults: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished clinical trialsFamily Practice, 2012
- Effectiveness and safety of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing influenza complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2010
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)PLOS ONE, 2007
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004