Evaluation of transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Open Access
- 4 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (3) , e0229696
Abstract
In clinical practice, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been widely used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond as well as within guideline recommendations. Here we aimed to verify whether two consecutive non-responses could be an optimal criterion for creating a rule to stop TACE being performed on these patients. This study evaluated 200 patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria, initially treated with TACE. TACE response was determined using the mRECIST criteria via dynamic CT or MRI. Median follow-up duration was 23.9 months. Within the 200 patients analyzed, 183 (91.5%) were male, with a total median age of 59.8 years. The mean size of the largest tumor was 6.8 cm, with 80 (40.0%) patients with ≥4 tumors. After the first TACE procedure, complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease were observed in 48 (24.0%), 87 (43.5%), 59 (29.5%) and 6 (3.0%) of patients, respectively. 45 (22.5%) patients showed no objective response (OR) following two consecutive TACE sessions. Of these, 28 received a subsequent TACE, with a 10.7% OR rate. Patients without OR showed poorer survival when compared to patients who achieved OR after repeated TACE. Multivariable analysis showed that size of the largest tumor >5cm and high alpha-fetoprotein of >200 ng/mL were significant factors associated with failure of OR to two consecutive TACE sessions. Patients showing no OR to two consecutive TACE sessions will present a poor OR to subsequent TACE procedures. Early transition to systemic therapy may be advocated in such cases.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bayer HealthCare
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of JapanLiver Cancer, 2014
- Efficacy of Sorafenib in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Refractory to Transarterial ChemoembolizationOncology, 2014
- Efficacy of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolizationJournal of Gastroenterology, 2013
- Optimal Measurement Modality and Method for Evaluation of Responses to Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Enhancement CriteriaJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2013
- Which Response Criteria Best Help Predict Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Chemoembolization? A Validation Study of Old and New ModelsRadiology, 2012
- Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular CarcinomaSeminars in Liver Disease, 2010
- Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survivalHepatology, 2003
- Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomaHepatology, 2002
- Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with subsegmental transcatheter arterial embolization.Radiology, 1993