On the Road to Precision Cancer Medicine: Analysis of Genomic Biomarker Actionability in 439 Patients
Open Access
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Vol. 14 (6) , 1488-1494
Abstract
Despite the increased use of molecular diagnostics, the extent to which patients who have these tests harbor potentially actionable aberrations is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients with diverse cancers, for whom next-generation sequencing (mostly 236-gene panel) had been performed. Data pertaining to the molecular alterations identified, as well as associated treatment suggestions (on- or off-label, or experimental), were extracted from molecular diagnostic reports. Most patients (420/439; 96%) had at least one molecular alteration: 1,813 alterations (in 207 distinct genes) were identified [the majority being mutations (62%) or amplifications (29%)]. The three most common gene abnormalities were TP53 (44%), KRAS (16%), and PIK3CA (12%). The median number of alterations per patient was 3 (range, 0–16). Nineteen patients (4%) had no alterations; 48 patients (11%) had only one alteration; and 372 patients had two or more abnormalities (85%). The median number of potentially actionable anomalies per patient was 2 (range, 0–8). Most patients (393/439; 90%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration, and in all these cases the aberration could at least be targeted by an experimental drug in a clinical trial. A total of 307 patients (70%) had an alteration that was actionable with an approved drug, but in only 89 patients (20%) was the drug approved for their disease (on-label). Next-generation sequencing identified theoretically actionable aberrations in 90% of our patients. Many of the drugs are, however, experimental or would require off-label use. Strategies to address drug access for patients harboring potentially actionable mutations are needed. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(6); 1488–94. ©2015 AACR.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Phase II Clinical Trials with Single-Agent Therapies in Advanced/Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Published between 2000 and 2009Clinical Cancer Research, 2012
- K-RAS Mutant Pancreatic Tumors Show Higher Sensitivity to MEK than to PI3K Inhibition In VivoPLOS ONE, 2012
- Making Personalized Cancer Medicine a Reality: Challenges and Opportunities in the Development of Biomarkers and Companion DiagnosticsClinical Cancer Research, 2012
- Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E MutationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Phase II, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Activity of Imatinib in Treating Life-Threatening Malignancies Known to Be Associated with Imatinib-Sensitive Tyrosine KinasesClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Major Response to Imatinib Mesylate in KIT-Mutated MelanomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Five-Year Follow-up of Patients Receiving Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibitionNature, 2005
- Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Mesylate in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Hematologic and Cytogenetic Responses to Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Myelogenous LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002