Current attitudes to testicular prosthesis insertion during radical orchidectomy—An international perspective
Open Access
- 26 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJUI Compass
- Vol. 6 (1) , e465
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess current international clinician practices, attitudes and barriers related to testicular prosthesis implantation in patients with testicular cancer at the time of radical inguinal orchidectomy.Methods: An international online survey of urologists who perform radical orchidectomy for testicular cancer was developed. The recruitment process used social media and the emailing lists of national urological societies. Responses were collected between 10 February 2021 and 31 May 2021. The primary outcome was the proportion of urologists who always offered testicular prosthesis implantation to patients undergoing radical orchidectomy. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for not offering testicular prosthesis implantation.Results: A total of 393 respondents took part in the online survey; of these, the majority were from the UK (66%), with the remaining international respondents (34%) from six different continents. Urologists (53%) reported they always offer testicular prosthesis implantation. Of those that offered testicular prosthesis implantation, 28% did so as a secondary procedure after radical orchidectomy, rather than the time of radical orchidectomy (72%). The most frequently selected reasons for not offering testicular prosthesis implantation included concerns about delaying chemotherapy (41%), infection (33%), impaired cosmesis (17%) and lack of availability (17%).Conclusion: Despite evidence confirming the safety and the psychological benefit of testicular prosthesis implantation during radical orchidectomy, current international practice suggests just over half of urologists always offer this to their patients. Increased clinician awareness of the low risk of complications and high patient satisfaction may act to reduce the perceived barriers in offering testicular prosthesis implantation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- An international survey of contemporary practices towards fertility assessment and preservation in patients undergoing radical inguinal orchidectomy for testicular cancerBJUI Compass, 2024
- Satisfaction with testicular prosthesis: a Portuguese questionnaire-based study in testicular cancer survivorsRevista Internacional de Andrología, 2022
- Insertion of a testicular prosthesis at the time of radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer is safe in patients who will subsequently undergo chemotherapy or radiotherapyAndrologia, 2020
- Patient Decision-making and Predictors of Genital Satisfaction Associated With Testicular Prostheses After Radical Orchiectomy: A Questionnaire-based Study of Men With Germ Cell Tumors of the TesticleUrology, 2019
- Satisfaction With Testicular Prosthesis After Radical OrchiectomyUrology, 2018
- Is it safe to insert a testicular prosthesis at the time of radical orchidectomy for testis cancer: an audit of 904 men undergoing radical orchidectomyBJU International, 2014
- Sexuality and body image in long-term survivors of testicular cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Feelings of loss and uneasiness or shame after removal of a testicle by orchidectomy: a population-based long-term follow-up of testicular cancer survivorsInternational Journal of Andrology, 2010
- The decision to have a prosthesis: A qualitative study of men with testicular cancerPsycho-Oncology, 2004
- Testicular implants and patient satisfaction: a questionnaire‐based study of men after orchidectomy for testicular cancerBJU International, 2001