The CONDUCT-AF Trial: Rationale and Design of a Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre Study Comparing Conduction System and Biventricular Pacing in Patients Undergoing Atrioventricular Node Ablation for Heart Failure with Atrial Fibrillation
Authors:
Open Access
- 8 September 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Heart Failure
- Vol. 27 (10) , 1927-1934
Abstract
Aims: There is a lack of data from randomized clinical trials comparing treatment outcomes between conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities and biventricular pacing (BVP) in symptomatic patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA). The CONDUCT-AF investigates whether CSP is non-inferior to BVP in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with symptomatic AF undergoing AVNA. Methods: This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial conducted across 10 European centres, enrolling 82 patients with symptomatic AF, HF with reduced LVEF, and narrow QRS. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to CSP or BVP with subsequent AVNA and followed for at least 24 months. The primary endpoint is the change in LVEF after 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to the first occurrence of worsening HF or cardiovascular death and its individual components, total number of HF hospitalizations, change in quality of life, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk test distance, and safety outcomes. Conclusions: The CONDUCT-AF trial will provide critical insights into the optimal pacing modality for patients with HF and refractory AF undergoing AVNA. Recruitment is expected to conclude in 2025, with the first study results anticipated in 2026.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arrhythmia-Induced CardiomyopathyJACC, 2024
- Right bundle branch activation during left bundle branch pacing: Marginal gains in left bundle branch pacing–optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy and the effects of atrioventricular delay dynamic optimizationHeartRhythm Case Reports, 2023
- Catheter Ablation in End-Stage Heart Failure with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Comparative cost analysis of implanting devices in different cardiac resynchronization therapeutic strategiesClinical Cardiology, 2023
- His-bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing following atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and reduced ejection fraction: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study—The ALTERNATIVE-AF trialHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with conduction system pacing leads: A comparison of His-bundle vs left bundle branch area pacing leadsHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart FailureJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2021
- Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial FibrillationJAMA, 2019
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure with a Narrow QRS ComplexNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Ventricular Remodeling During Long-Term Right Ventricular Pacing Following His Bundle AblationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006