Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced sarcomas
Authors:
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Care for patients with advanced sarcomas is mainly palliative. Gemcitabine, a nucleoside antimetabolite, is an analog of deoxycytidine that has shown antitumor activity in several tumors. The aim of the current study was to determine the clinical activity of gemcitabine in patients with sarcomas.METHODS: The authors evaluated gemcitabine in patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas; one prior exposure to chemotherapy treatment was allowed. Prior radiation was allowed if given to non‐indicator lesions. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes, every week × three, cycles repeated q28 days.RESULTS: Twenty nine of 30 patients were evaluable; one patient refused to initiate study treatment. The mean age was 50 years (range, 22‐81 years); 59% were male, and 35% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (vs. 1 or 2). Patients were histologically classified as leiomyosarcoma (seven gastrointestinal, four retroperitoneal, two inferior vena caval, three of the extremity, and two uterine), synovial (two patients), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (two patients), fibrosarcoma (one patient), osteosarcoma (two patients), liposarcoma (one patient), hemangiosarcoma (one patient), or giant cell (one patient). Patients received an average of two cycles (range, one to eight). Eighty three percent of patients discontinued treatment due to progression and 14% due to toxicity/refusal. Hematologic toxicities ≥ Grade 3 were seen in 32% of patients and consisted of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Anorexia (Grade 1/2 in 6 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), nausea (Grade 1/2 in 7 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), and lethargy (Grade 1/2 in 19 patients) were the most frequently observed nonhematologic toxicities. One patient experienced Grade 3 edema and muscle infarction. A different patient experienced unexplained Grade 3 chest pain. One partial response was observed in a uterine leiomyosarcoma patient lasting at least three months. Overall response rate was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0‐15). Median time ‐to progression was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8–3.0).CONCLUSIONS: The current gemcitabine regimen demonstrated acceptable levels of toxicity, but it failed to produce the number of responses needed to justify expansion of the current study. This regimen is not recommended for advanced sarcomas. Cancer 2002;94:3225–9. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10602Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Phase II Clinical Investigation of Gemcitabine in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Window Evaluation of Dose Rate on Gemcitabine Triphosphate AccumulationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Treatment of Classical Kaposi’s Sarcoma with GemcitabineDermatology, 2001
- Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Conventional-Dose Doxorubicin Plus Ifosfamide Versus High-Dose Doxorubicin Plus Ifosfamide Plus Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcomasAnti-Cancer Drugs, 2000
- Gemcitabine in soft tissue or bone sarcoma resistant to standard chemotherapy: a phase II studyCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2000
- Needed: qualitative improvement in antisarcoma therapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus ifosfamide plus doxorubicin or mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin against advanced soft tissue sarcomas.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- An intergroup phase III randomized study of doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and mesna in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958