Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI
Authors:
Open Access
- 21 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 47 (9) , 4177-4188
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has great potential to improve prostate cancer diagnosis; however, subtle differences between cancer and confounding conditions render prostate MRI interpretation challenging. The tissue collected from patients who undergo radical prostatectomy provides a unique opportunity to correlate histopathology images of the prostate with preoperative MRI to accurately map the extent of cancer from histopathology images onto MRI. We seek to develop an open‐source, easy‐to‐use platform to align presurgical MRI and histopathology images of resected prostates in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to create accurate cancer labels on MRI.Methods: Here, we introduce RAdiology Pathology Spatial Open‐Source multi‐Dimensional Integration (RAPSODI), the first open‐source framework for the registration of radiology and pathology images. RAPSODI relies on three steps. First, it creates a three‐dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the histopathology specimen as a digital representation of the tissue before gross sectioning. Second, RAPSODI registers corresponding histopathology and MRI slices. Third, the optimized transforms are applied to the cancer regions outlined on the histopathology images to project those labels onto the preoperative MRI.Results: We tested RAPSODI in a phantom study where we simulated various conditions, for example, tissue shrinkage during fixation. Our experiments showed that RAPSODI can reliably correct multiple artifacts. We also evaluated RAPSODI in 157 patients from three institutions that underwent radical prostatectomy and have very different pathology processing and scanning. RAPSODI was evaluated in 907 corresponding histpathology‐MRI slices and achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.97 ± 0.01 for the prostate, a Hausdorff distance of 1.99 ± 0.70 mm for the prostate boundary, a urethra deviation of 3.09 ± 1.45 mm, and a landmark deviation of 2.80 ± 0.59 mm between registered histopathology images and MRI.Conclusion: Our robust framework successfully mapped the extent of cancer from histopathology slices onto MRI providing labels from training machine learning methods to detect cancer on MRI.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason ScoreEuropean Urology, 2016
- Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2015
- Framework for 3D histologic reconstruction and fusion with in vivo MRI: Preliminary results of characterizing pulmonary inflammation in a mouse modelMedical Physics, 2015
- Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013JAMA, 2015
- Registration of in vivo prostate MRI and pseudo‐whole mount histology using Local Affine Transformations guided by Internal Structures (LATIS)Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2014
- Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challengeMedical Image Analysis, 2014
- Prostate: Registration of Digital Histopathologic Images to in Vivo MR Images Acquired by Using Endorectal Receive CoilRadiology, 2012
- Multiparametric 3T Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cancer: Histopathological Correlation Using Prostatectomy Specimens Processed in Customized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based MoldsJournal of Urology, 2011
- Registration Methodology for Histological Sections and In Vivo Imaging of Human ProstateAcademic Radiology, 2008
- Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR imagesIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1999