Noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring by the ClearSight system during robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Tokushima Faculty of Medicine in The Journal of Medical Investigation
- Vol. 65 (1.2) , 69-73
Abstract
Robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is commonly performed in the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. However, the steep Trendelenburg position (25) and pneumoperitoneum required for this procedure can sometimes cause hemodynamic changes. Although blood pressure is traditionally monitored invasively during RALRP, the ClearSight system (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) enables a totally noninvasive and simple continuous blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring based on finger arterial pressure pulse contour analysis. We therefore investigated whether noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure measurements using the ClearSight system were comparable to those obtained invasively in patients undergoing RALRP. Ten patients scheduled for RALRP with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I‐II were included in this study. At each of the seven defined time points, noninvasive and invasive blood pressure measurements were documented and compared in each patient using Bland‐Altman analysis. Although the blood pressure measured with the ClearSight system correlated with that measured invasively, a large difference between the values obtained by the two devices was noted. The ClearSight system was unable to detect blood pressure accurately during RALRP, suggesting that blood pressure monitoring using this device alone is not feasible in this small patient population. J. Med. Invest. 65:69‐73, February, 2018Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of recruitment maneuver on arterial oxygenation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with intraoperative 15 cmH2O positive end expiratory pressureKorean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2016
- Accuracy and Precision of Continuous Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring Compared with Invasive Arterial PressureAnesthesiology, 2014
- Comparison of continuous non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent automated arm arterial pressure measurement in patients under general anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2014
- Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin® does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patientsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2013
- Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgeryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012
- Hemodynamic changes during robotic radical prostatectomySaudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012
- Diastolic function: the influence of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic hysterectomyEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2009
- Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patientsBMC Anesthesiology, 2009
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983
- Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients