Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer
Open Access
- 21 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Genetics
- Vol. 14, 1052383
Abstract
Identifying pathogenic missense variants in hereditary cancer is critical to the efforts of patient surveillance and risk-reduction strategies. For this purpose, many different gene panels consisting of different number and/or set of genes are available and we are particularly interested in a panel of 26 genes with a varying degree of hereditary cancer risk consisting of ABRAXAS1, ATM, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MEN1, MLH1, MRE11, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. In this study, we have compiled a collection of the missense variations reported in any of these 26 genes. More than a thousand missense variants were collected from ClinVar and the targeted screen of a breast cancer cohort of 355 patients which contributed to this set with 160 novel missense variations. We analyzed the impact of the missense variations on protein stability by five different predictors including both sequence- (SAAF2EC and MUpro) and structure-based (Maestro, mCSM, CUPSAT) predictors. For the structure-based tools, we have utilized the AlphaFold (AF2) protein structures which comprise the first structural analysis of this hereditary cancer proteins. Our results agreed with the recent benchmarks that computed the power of stability predictors in discriminating the pathogenic variants. Overall, we reported a low-to-medium-level performance for the stability predictors in discriminating pathogenic variants, except MUpro which had an AUROC of 0.534 (95% CI [0.499–0.570]). The AUROC values ranged between 0.614–0.719 for the total set and 0.596–0.682 for the set with high AF2 confidence regions. Furthermore, our findings revealed that the confidence score for a given variant in the AF2 structure could alone predict pathogenicity more robustly than any of the tested stability predictors with an AUROC of 0.852. Altogether, this study represents the first structural analysis of the 26 hereditary cancer genes underscoring 1) the thermodynamic stability predicted from AF2 structures as a moderate and 2) the confidence score of AF2 as a strong descriptor for variant pathogenicity.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference testsBioinformatics, 2013
- Cancer Missense Mutations Alter Binding Properties of Proteins and Their Interaction NetworksPLOS ONE, 2013
- A missense mutation in CLIC2 associated with intellectual disability is predicted by in silico modeling to affect protein stability and dynamicsProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2011
- Prediction of the responsiveness to pharmacological chaperones: lysosomal human alpha-galactosidase, a case of studyOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 2010
- Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domainProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- How Protein Stability and New Functions Trade OffPLOS Computational Biology, 2008
- Abraxas and RAP80 Form a BRCA1 Protein Complex Required for the DNA Damage ResponseScience, 2007
- Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting proteinNature, 2006
- CUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutationsNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysisJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2004