New Paradigm in Dose-Finding Trials: Patient-Specific Dosing and Beyond Phase I
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 11 (15) , 5342-5346
Abstract
We propose a new paradigm for the clinical evaluation of new cancer therapies. It entails adjusting the search for the optimal dose on the basis of measurable patient characteristics that may be predictive of adverse responses to treatment, and extending this search beyond phase I and into phases II and III. We provide examples of (a) how the fine-tuning of dose may involve utilization of patient-specific attributes to obtain a personalized treatment regimen, and (b) how novel methods for phase I design can be used to update the working dose for the conduct of phase II and III cancer clinical trials. These examples should be interpreted as an enticement for the development of new methods to implement the proposed new paradigm.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose controlStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Patient Characteristics Compete with Dose as Predictors of Acute Treatment Toxicity in Early Phase Clinical TrialsClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Relationship of Baseline Serum Bilirubin to Efficacy and Toxicity of Single-Agent Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Individualized Patient Dosing in Phase I Clinical Trials: The Role of Escalation With Overdose Control in PNU-214936Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trialStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Optimal Bayesian-feasible dose escalation for cancer phase I trialsStatistics & Probability Letters, 1998
- IMPROVED DESIGNS FOR DOSE ESCALATION STUDIES USING PHARMACOKINETIC MEASUREMENTSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Phase I trial design: Are new methodologies being put into practice?Annals of Oncology, 1996
- Consistency of continual reassessment method under model misspecificationBiometrika, 1996
- Methods for dose finding studies in cancer clinical trials: A review and results of a monte carlo studyStatistics in Medicine, 1991