Serological profiles of pan-coronavirus-specific responses in COVID-19 patients using a multiplexed electro-chemiluminescence-based testing platform
Open Access
- 3 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (6) , e0252628
Abstract
Serological assessment of SARS-CoV-2 specific responses are an essential tool for determining the prevalence of past SARS-CoV-2 infections in the population especially when testing occurs after symptoms have developed and limited contact tracing is in place. The goal of our study was to test a new 10-plex electro-chemiluminescence-based assay to measure IgM and IgG responses to the spike proteins from multiple human coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2, assess the epitope specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response against full-length spike protein, receptor-binding domain and N-terminal domain of the spike protein, and the nucleocapsid protein. We carried out the assay on samples collected from three sample groups: subjects diagnosed with COVID-19 from the U.S. Army hospital at Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek, South Korea; healthcare administrators from the same hospital but with no reported diagnosis of COVID-19; and pre-pandemic samples. We found that the new CoV-specific multiplex assay was highly sensitive allowing plasma samples to be diluted 1:30,000 with a robust signal. The reactivity of IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and IgM responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein could distinguish COVID-19 samples from non-COVID-19 and pre-pandemic samples. The data from the three sample groups also revealed a unique pattern of cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and seasonal coronaviruses HKU1 and OC43. Our findings show that the CoV-2 IgM response is highly specific while the CoV-2 IgG response is more cross-reactive across a range of human CoVs and also showed that IgM and IgG responses show distinct patterns of epitope specificity. In summary, this multiplex assay was able to distinguish samples by COVID-19 status and characterize distinct trends in terms of cross-reactivity and fine-specificity in antibody responses, underscoring its potential value in diagnostic or serosurveillance efforts.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Military Infectious Disease Research Program
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Antibody Testing for COVID-19The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2020
- Serology assays to manage COVID-19Science, 2020
- Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort studyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19Nature Medicine, 2020
- Comparison of ELISA with electro-chemiluminescence technology for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of serological responses to vaccinationMalaria Journal, 2020
- Middle East respiratory syndrome: what we learned from the 2015 outbreak in the Republic of KoreaThe Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2018
- Disappearance of Antibodies to SARS-Associated Coronavirus after RecoveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Longitudinal profile of antibodies against SARS‐coronavirus in SARS patients and their clinical significanceRespirology, 2006
- Chronological evolution of IgM, IgA, IgG and neutralisation antibodies after infection with SARS-associated coronavirusClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2004
- The time course of the immune response to experimental coronavirus infection of manEpidemiology and Infection, 1990