An adaptive design for early clinical development including interim decision for single‐arm trial with external controls or randomized trial
- 21 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 21 (3) , 625-640
Abstract
In early clinical development, randomized controlled trials (RCT) or single‐arm trials with external controls (SATwEC) are design options, which allow adjustment for confounding: RCT via design, SATwEC via analysis using propensity score methods. SATwEC requires less investment than RCT. However, if the confounder space substantially differs between the experimental and external control group, the SATwEC might lead to inappropriate decisions for further development. We develop an adaptive two‐stage design (ATD) for early clinical development that reduces the risk of unreliable decision‐making at the end of a SATwEC. In Stage I, subjects are solely assigned to the experimental group. If at the interim the propensity score distributions of internal and external data are comparable based on the preference score, the subjects in stage II will again be solely assigned to the experimental arm; if not, a randomized stage II will be conducted. In a simulation study guided by a motivating example, data is generated using a time‐to‐event model with observable and unobservable confounders. The confounder space is varied to investigate the impact on false go/stop probabilities as well as a loss function, which reflects the quality of treatment effect estimates and decision‐making. The proposed ATD provides a compromise between optimizing quality (as expressed by false go/stop probabilities and the loss function) and investment (defined by sample size and trial duration).Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Cancer Research Bureaucracy on Innovation, Costs, and Patient CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Use of historical control data for assessing treatment effects in clinical trialsPharmaceutical Statistics, 2013
- A tool for assessing the feasibility of comparative effectiveness researchComparative Effectiveness Research, 2013
- Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation studyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2012
- Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunitiesTrials, 2012
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- Randomized Phase II Trials: Inevitable or Inadvisable?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look ForwardStatistical Science, 2010
- Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Variable Selection for Propensity Score ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2006