Monolingual searches can limit and bias results in global literature reviews

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

• Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them
  Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020
• Exploration of Concerns about the Evidence-Based Guideline Approach in Conservation Management: Hints from Medical Practice
  Environmental Management, 2020
• Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses
  Ecology and Evolution, 2020
• Assessing the uneven global distribution of readership, submissions and publications in applied ecology: Obvious problems without obvious solutions
  Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019
• The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study
  Systematic Reviews, 2018
• Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science
  PLOS Biology, 2016
• Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security
  Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2013
• Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German
  The Lancet, 1997
• Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995