A process-based assessment of landscape change and salmon habitat losses in the Chehalis River basin, USA
Open Access
- 2 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (11) , e0258251
Abstract
Identifying necessary stream and watershed restoration actions requires quantifying natural potential habitat conditions to diagnose habitat change and evaluate restoration potential. We used three general methods of quantifying natural potential: historical maps and survey notes, contemporary reference sites, and models. Historical information was available only for the floodplain habitat analysis. We used contemporary reference sites to estimate natural potential habitat conditions for wood abundance, riparian shade, main channel length, and side channel length. For fine sediment, temperature, and beaver ponds we relied on models. We estimated a 90% loss of potential beaver pond area, 91% loss of side-channel length, and 92% loss or degradation of floodplain marshes and ponds. Spawning habitat area change due to wood loss ranged from -23% to -68% across subbasins. Other changes in habitat quantity or quality were smaller—either in magnitude or spatial extent—including rearing habitat areas, stream temperature, and accessible stream length. Historical floodplain habitat mapping provided the highest spatial resolution and certainty in locations and amounts of floodplain habitat lost or degraded, whereas use of the contemporary reference information provided less site specificity for wood abundance and side-channel length change. The models for fine sediment levels and beaver pond areas have the lowest reach-specific certainty, whereas the model of temperature change has higher certainty because it is based on a detailed riparian inventory. Despite uncertainties at the reach level, confidence in subbasin-level estimates of habitat change is moderate to high because accuracy increases as data are aggregated over multiple reaches. Our results show that the largest habitat losses were floodplain and beaver pond habitats, but use of these habitat change results in salmon life-cycle models can illustrate how the potential benefits of alternative habitat restoration actions varies among species with differing habitat preferences.Keywords
Funding Information
- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW #15-03970)
- Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO#17-1477)
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- RESTORING SALMON HABITAT FOR A CHANGING CLIMATERiver Research and Applications, 2012
- A new method to identify the fluvial regimes used by spawning salmonidsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2009
- Setting River Restoration Priorities: A Review of Approaches and a General Protocol for Identifying and Prioritizing ActionsNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2008
- A Regional and Geomorphic Reference for Quantities and Volumes of Instream Wood in Unmanaged Forested Basins of Washington StateNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2007
- Lost Watersheds: Barriers, Aquatic Habitat Connectivity, and Salmon Persistence in the Willamette and Lower Columbia River BasinsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2006
- A Classification of Habitat Types in a Large River and Their Use by Juvenile SalmonidsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2005
- The Importance of Beaver Ponds to Coho Salmon Production in the Stillaguamish River Basin, Washington, USANorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2004
- An Approach to Restoring Salmonid Habitat-forming Processes in Pacific Northwest WatershedsFisheries, 1999
- Channel Hydraulics, Habitat Use, and Body Form of Juvenile Coho Salmon, Steelhead, and Cutthroat Trout in StreamsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1988
- Optimal Stock Size and Harvest Rate in Multistage Life History ModelsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1986