Simulating mismatch between calibration and target population in AI for mammography the retrospective VAIB study
Open Access
- 8 May 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in npj Digital Medicine
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
AI cancer detection models require calibration to attain the desired balance between cancer detection rate (CDR) and false positive rate. In this study, we simulate the impact of six types of mismatches between the calibration population and the clinical target population, by creating purposefully non-representative datasets to calibrate AI for clinical settings. Mismatching the acquisition year between healthy and cancer-diagnosed screening participants led to a distortion in CDR between −3% to +19%. Mismatching age led to a distortion in CDR between −0.2% to +27%. Mismatching breast density distribution led to a distortion in CDR between +1% to 16%. Mismatching mammography vendors lead to a distortion in CDR between −32% to + 33%. Mismatches between calibration population and target clinical population lead to clinically important deviations. It is vital for safe clinical AI integration to ensure that important aspects of the calibration population are representative of the target population.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swedish Innovation Agency VINNOVA
- Regional Cancer Centers in Collaboration
- Region Stockholm
- Swedish Cancer Society
- Swedish Research Council
- Emil and Wera Cornell foundation
- Lillian Sagens and Curt Ericssons Foundation
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen NorwayEuropean Radiology, 2024
- Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2023
- Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysisThe Lancet Digital Health, 2022
- Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric AssessmentJournal of Digital Imaging, 2022
- Population-based mammography screening attendance in Sweden 2017–2018: A cross-sectional register study to assess the impact of sociodemographic factorsThe Breast, 2021
- Examining the Potential Impact of Race Multiplier Utilization in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Calculation on African-American Care OutcomesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2020
- Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation studyThe Lancet Digital Health, 2020
- External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening MammogramsJAMA Oncology, 2020
- How to Read Articles That Use Machine LearningJAMA, 2019
- Evaluating Imaging and Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis Devices at the FDAAcademic Radiology, 2012