Moral consideration for AI systems by 2030
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in AI and Ethics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 591-606
Abstract
This paper makes a simple case for extending moral consideration to some AI systems by 2030. It involves a normative premise and a descriptive premise. The normative premise is that humans have a duty to extend moral consideration to beings that have a non-negligible chance, given the evidence, of being conscious. The descriptive premise is that some AI systems do in fact have a non-negligible chance, given the evidence, of being conscious by 2030. The upshot is that humans have a duty to extend moral consideration to some AI systems by 2030. And if we have a duty to do that, then we plausibly also have a duty to start preparing now, so that we can be ready to treat AI systems with respect and compassion when the time comes.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Centre for Effective Altruism (A22-0668)
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral considerationEthics and Information Technology, 2010
- How neuroscience will change our view on consciousnessCognitive Neuroscience, 2010
- Bootstrapping the mindBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008
- Towards a true neural stance on consciousnessTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006
- Consciousness and Self-ConsciousnessThe Monist, 2004
- Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human LivesPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 1997
- The symbol grounding problemPhysica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1990
- On Being Morally ConsiderableThe Journal of Philosophy, 1978
- Sensations and Brain ProcessesPhilosophical Review, 1959
- IS CONSCIOUSNESS A BRAIN PROCESS?British Journal of Psychology, 1956