Axillary De-Escalation After Neoadjuvant Therapy in cN2/N3 HER2-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Navigating Biological Promise and Clinical Uncertainty
Open Access
Abstract
Axillary de-escalation after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is established in cN1 breast cancer, but the trials validating sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and omission of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) largely excluded cN2/N3 disease. In HER2-positive and triple-negative disease, NST achieves axillary pathological complete response (pCR) in about one-third of cN2/N3 patients and 70–80% of those achieving breast pCR—establishing biological plausibility, not technical or trial-validated eligibility. The prospective evidence base comprises 87 patients evaluated against completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND), only 41 informative for false-negative rate. Much of this evidence is defined by node count rather than by matting or fixation, so it applies directly to patients with more than three suspicious but mobile nodes—AJCC cN1 by fixation criteria, but sharing the same multi-node technical problem—while being correspondingly less confined to AJCC-defined cN2/N3 than the label implies. Across non-randomised cohorts, no oncological penalty has emerged after de-escalation in selected responders, though only three supply an axillary-recurrence numerator confined to advanced nodal disease. Within these limits, omission of cALND may reasonably be offered to selected excellent responders with cN2a or level I/II-predominant disease and TAD-confirmed nodal pCR, provided RNI is retained, and the decision is multidisciplinary-team supported and documented. Omitting RNI as well rests on extrapolation from NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304, which excluded this population, and should remain within prospective evaluation, as should cALND omission for residual disease. Level I/II TAD/SLNB does not sample the compartments defining cN2b, cN3a, or cN3c disease and samples only the axillary component of cN3b disease, which cALND does not sample either; comprehensive RNI remains indicated in these subgroups. In cN2b, the axilla is clinically uninvolved, so cALND is not required, and axillary staging by SLNB alone is appropriate. cN2/N3-specific validation of false-negative rate and outcomes remains the priority.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- De-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast CancerJAMA Surgery, 2025
- Axillary lymph node dissection in triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer patients with clinical N2 achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: Is it necessary?The Breast, 2024
- Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of Oncology, 2023
- Tailored axillary surgery in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer: Pre-planned feasibility substudy of TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57-18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101)The Breast, 2021
- Can we avoid axillary lymph node dissection in N2 breast cancer patients with chemo-sensitive tumours such as HER2 and TNBC?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020
- Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challengesAnnals of Oncology, 2020
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 studyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018
- Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 2016
- Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast CancerJAMA, 2013
- Internal Mammary Lymph Node Drainage Patterns in Patients With Breast Cancer Documented by Breast LymphoscintigraphyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2001