Laparoscopy Simulators
Authors:
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 21 (3) , 274-279
Abstract
To reduce the complication rate associated with laparoscopic surgery and to improve training, several simulators have been incorporated into training curricula and skills courses. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages and compare the different types of simulators available. We also reviewed the literature to assess the acquisition of skills using these simulators and their transfer to real operations. It is important to realize that currently, any form of simulation is merely an adjunct to, and not a replacement for, traditional methods of training and that supervision and feedback are essential. More collaboration is needed between urologists and simulator companies to produce operation-specific simulated modules for urologic procedures.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Long-Term OutcomesJournal of Endourology, 2005
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2005
- Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Fatal Aortic Injury During LaparoscopyAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, 2003
- Bowel Injury in Gynecologic LaparoscopyThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2003
- Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Transfer of Training in Acquiring Laparoscopic SkillsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Urologic LaparoscopySurgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 2001
- A Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic CholecystectomiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1991