Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates as after superovulation therapy
Authors:
- Paul ClamanPCPaul Claman
- Valerie WilkieVWValerie Wilkie
- Denise CollinsDCDenise Collins
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 82 (1) , 13-16
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed timing of intrauterine insemination results in a significantly improved pregnancy rate in female partners of quadriplegic menFertility and Sterility, 2001
- Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cyclesFertility and Sterility, 1999
- Efficacy of Superovulation and Intrauterine Insemination in the Treatment of InfertilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Intrauterine insemination: effect of the temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge, human chorionic gonadotrophin administration and insemination on pregnancy ratesHuman Reproduction, 1997
- The value of single versus repeated insemination in intra-uterine donor insemination cyclesHuman Reproduction, 1995
- Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles?Fertility and Sterility, 1994
- A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cyclesFertility and Sterility, 1992
- Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: a possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilizationFertility and Sterility, 1987
- Minimum time lapse between luteinizing hormone surge or human chorionic gonadotropin administration and follicular ruptureFertility and Sterility, 1982
- Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17β, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesteroneAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980