Evaluation of ILEX SelfCerv for Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Gynecology Clinic Attendees at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa
Authors:
- Teboho Amelia TiitiTTTeboho Amelia Tiiti
- Tebogo Loraine MashishiTMTebogo Loraine Mashishi
- Varsetile Varster NkwinikaVarsetile Varster Nkwinika
- Kgotlaethata Aaron MolefiKMKgotlaethata Aaron Molefi
- Ina BenoyIBIna Benoy
- Johannes BogersJBJohannes Bogers
- Selokela Gloria SelabeSSSelokela Gloria Selabe
- Ramokone Lisbeth LebeloRamokone Lisbeth Lebelo
Open Access
- 20 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 10 (21) , 4817
Abstract
Background: The SelfCerv Self-Collection Cervical Health Screening Kit (Ilex Medical Ltd., Johannesburg, South Africa) is an applicator tampon designed for self-collection of vaginal samples for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and E6/E7 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). The study aimed to evaluate the performance of the SelfCerv applicator tampon for the detection of hr-HPV for cervical cancer screening, and further to investigate women’s experiences and preferences regarding self-sampling. Methods: Vaginal samples were collected from 527 gynecology clinic attendees aged ≥18 years at a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Self-samples were collected using the SelfCerv kit, followed by endocervical samples collected by a healthcare professional using Cervex-Brush® Combi. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on self-sampling experiences and preferences. Both samples were tested for 14 high-risk (hr) HPV types and E6/E7 mRNA using the Abbott RealTime HR-HPV and Aptima HR-HPV mRNA assays, respectively. Results: The overall agreement for hr-HPV typing between 527 paired samples was good (87.1%; κ =0.74) with high sensitivity (86.2%) and specificity (88.0%). HPV-16 (96.4%; κ = 0.83) had higher agreement rate than HPV-18 (96.8%; κ = 0.72) and the other 12 hr-HPVs (86.5%; κ = 0.72). Two hundred and eighty-five (285) sample pairs tested for E6/E7 mRNA showed fair agreement (70.2%; κ= 0.34). Furthermore, self-sampling was reported as comfortable (90.5%) and painless (86.7%), with 88.4% of women preferring self-collection. Conclusions: Self-collected samples had good agreement with the healthcare professional-collected samples for the detection of hr-HPV DNA and the procedure was highly preferred by women. Self-sampling using SelfCerv can be used as an alternative to healthcare professional sampling in clinic-based routine cervical cancer screening.Keywords
Funding Information
- Poliomyelitis Research Foundation (PRF_18/101)
- National Research Foundation (NRF_118710)
- Flemish Government- Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR-IUC) (VLIR-UOS ZIUS2015AP021)
- National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) Research Trust (GRANT004_94740)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: End of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening testGynecologic Oncology, 2015
- Screening for Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesAnnals of Global Health, 2014
- Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysisThe Lancet Oncology, 2014
- Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocolSystematic Reviews, 2013
- The Clinical Role of HPV Testing in Primary and Secondary Cervical Cancer ScreeningObstetrics and Gynecology International, 2013
- Automated dose dispensing service for primary healthcare patients: a systematic reviewSystematic Reviews, 2013
- Evidence Regarding Human Papillomavirus Testing in Secondary Prevention of Cervical CancerVaccine, 2012
- Comparability of Self-Collected Vaginal Swabs and Physician-Collected Cervical Swabs for Detection of Human Papillomavirus Infections in Rakai, UgandaSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2007
- Agreement between Self- and Clinician-Collected Specimen Results for Detection and Typing of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Specimens from Women in Gugulethu, South AfricaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysisGynecologic Oncology, 2007