Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia among Patients with Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
Authors:
- 14 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Vol. 160 (3) , 480-487
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated the prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced oropharyngeal cancer.Study Design: Retrospective study.Setting: Single‐institution tertiary cancer care center.Subjects and Methods: We identified patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer with pretreatment positron emission tomography–computed tomography scans for image analysis. Data were collected on the following variables: age, sex, smoking and alcohol status, stage (TNM and American Joint Committee on Cancer), human papillomavirus (HPV) status, body mass index (BMI), and treatment modality.Results: Of 113 patients identified with oropharyngeal cancer, 32 had sarcopenia: these patients were older (63.5 vs 57.6 years, P =. 01), were less likely to be male (53.1% vs 76.5%, P =. 03), and had a lower mean BMI (24.5 vs 28.4 kg/m2, P =. 009). Eighty‐five subjects had HPV‐positive disease, and they had a higher BMI (28.2 vs 24.2 kg/m2, P =. 01) than that of patients without HPV. Twenty‐one subjects who were HPV positive had less cancer recurrence (24.7% vs 48.1%, P =. 04) than that of their HPV‐negative counterparts. Log‐rank testing showed no difference in DFS (P =. 06) associated with sarcopenia but a significant difference in OS (P =. 049). There were differences in DFS (P =. 009) and OS (P =. 023) based on HPV status. According to univariable and multivariable models, HPV positivity exhibited improved DFS and OS. Sarcopenia was not statistically significant in survival models; however, it was associated with increased mortality and recurrence.Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor affecting OS independent of HPV status in advanced oropharyngeal cancer.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comorbidity and prognosis in head and neck cancers: Differences by subsite, stage, and human papillomavirus statusHead & Neck, 2013
- Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensusThe Lancet Oncology, 2011
- Human Papillomavirus and Survival of Patients with Oropharyngeal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Body composition in patients with non−small cell lung cancer: a contemporary view of cancer cachexia with the use of computed tomography image analysisThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010
- The emerging role of computerized tomography in assessing cancer cachexiaCurrent Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care, 2009
- Sarcopenia in an Overweight or Obese Patient Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- A descriptive review of the factors contributing to nutritional compromise in patients with head and neck cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2009
- A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine careApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2008
- Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional imageJournal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancerHead & Neck, 2001