Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Science & Justice
- Vol. 54 (4) , 258-261
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- US National Institute of Justice (2011-DN-BX-K541)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new methodological framework to interpret complex DNA profiles using likelihood ratiosForensic Science International: Genetics, 2013
- DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methodsForensic Science International: Genetics, 2012
- Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation*,†Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011
- Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v TScience & Justice, 2011
- An Information Gap in DNA Evidence InterpretationPLOS ONE, 2009
- DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixturesForensic Science International, 2006
- The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedingsScience & Justice, 2006
- The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statementsScience & Justice, 2000
- More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositionsScience & Justice, 2000
- A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in caseworkScience & Justice, 1998