Lindstrom theorems for fragments of first-order logic
Authors:
- Johan van BenthemJBJohan van Benthem
- Balder Ten CateBCBalder Ten Cate
- Jouko VaananenJVJouko Vaananen
Preprint
Abstract
Lindstr\"om theorems characterize logics in terms of model-theoretic conditions such as Compactness and the L\"owenheim-Skolem property. Most existing characterizations of this kind concern extensions of first-order logic. But on the other hand, many logics relevant to computer science are fragments or extensions of fragments of first-order logic, e.g., k-variable logics and various modal logics. Finding Lindstr\"om theorems for these languages can be challenging, as most known techniques rely on coding arguments that seem to require the full expressive power of first-order logic. In this paper, we provide Lindstr\"om theorems for several fragments of first-order logic, including the k-variable fragments for k>2, Tarski's relation algebra, graded modal logic, and the binary guarded fragment. We use two different proof techniques. One is a modification of the original Lindstr\"om proof. The other involves the modal concepts of bisimulation, tree unraveling, and finite depth. Our results also imply semantic preservation theorems.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guards, Bounds, and Generalized SemanticsJournal of Logic, Language and Information, 2005
- On the Restraining Power of GuardsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1999
- Interpolation, preservation, and pebble gamesThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1999
- Modal Languages and Bounded Fragments of Predicate LogicJournal of Philosophical Logic, 1998
- A Formalization of Set Theory without Variables1987
- Which logic is the right logic?Synthese, 1975
- Absolute logics and L∞ωAnnals of Mathematical Logic, 1972
- On Extensions of Elementary LogicTheoria, 1969
- Skolem-type normal forms for first-order languages with a generalized quantifierFundamenta Mathematicae, 1964