Autonomy, devolution and intergovernmental relations
Author:
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Regional & Federal Studies
- Vol. 14 (1) , 26-65
Abstract
The concept of autonomy as self-rule is delineated by examination of intergovernmental relations within eight devolutionary situations: Belgium, Crimea (Ukraine), Ethiopia, Greenland (Denmark), Mexico, Scotland (United Kingdom), South Africa and Spain. After autonomy and devolution are profiled, the autonomy situations are comparatively examined through their intergovernmental institutional structures, fiscal arrangements and political channels. These three processes are at the core of post-devolution autonomy situations, and their sufficiency within a polity contributes to meaningful self-rule. While in most of the eight autonomy situations effective institutional and political channels exist, the fiscal ties are weaker and non-existent in some cases, leading to fiscal dependence. In those situations where one-party rule prevails, institutional and political autonomy is also weaker, attenuating autonomy through devolution.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Formal Mechanisms of Intergovernmental Relations in BelgiumRegional & Federal Studies, 2002
- Developing Democracy1999
- Is Ethiopia Democratic? A Political Success StoryJournal of Democracy, 1998
- Is Ethiopia Democratic? A Bureaucratic Authoritarian RegimeJournal of Democracy, 1998
- Regionalism and democracy in EthiopiaThird World Quarterly, 1998
- Governance, Administration and Development1997
- Federal Evolution in SpainInternational Political Science Review, 1996
- Ethiopia's “Leap in the Dark”: Federalism and Self-Determination in the New constitutionJournal of African Law, 1995
- Ethnonationalism1994
- FROM TRANSFORMATION TO MODERNIZATION: ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEPublic Administration, 1993