A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best–worst scaling
- 1 December 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Choice Modelling
- Vol. 21, 15-24
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Discovery (8124-98)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) (430060)
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heterogeneity in the Consistency of Best–Worst Scale ResponsesAustralasian Marketing Journal, 2015
- Individual level models vs. sample level models: contrasts and mutual benefitsTransportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2015
- The best of times and the worst of times are interchangeable.Decision, 2014
- Best-Worst Scaling in analytical closed-form solutionJournal of Choice Modelling, 2014
- Household level innovation diffusion model of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells from stated preference dataEnergy Policy, 2014
- Models of best–worst choice and ranking among multiattribute options (profiles)Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2012
- Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference informationJournal of Choice Modelling, 2008
- Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choicesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2005