Putting Skill as Nearly Indistinguishable from Noise: An Empirical Bayes Analysis of PGA Tour Performance
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
We revisit a foundational question in golf analytics: how important are the core components of performance--driving, approach play, and putting--in explaining success on the PGA Tour? Building on Mark Broadie's strokes gained analyses, we use an empirical Bayes approach to estimate latent golfer skill and assess statistical significance using a multiple testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate. While tee-to-green skill shows clear and substantial differences across players, putting skill is both less variable and far less reliably estimable. Indeed, putting performance appears nearly indistinguishable from noise.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introducing Grid WAR: rethinking WAR for starting pitchersJournal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2024
- An empirical Bayes' procedure for ranking players in Ryder Cup golfJournal of Applied Statistics, 2015
- Assessing Golfer Performance on the PGA TOURInterfaces, 2012
- In-season prediction of batting averages: A field test of empirical Bayes and Bayes methodologiesThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 2008
- Skill, Luck, and Streaky Play on the PGA TourJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2008
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified ApproachJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2003
- Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple TestingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1995