Comparison of Deep Learning Models and Optimization Algorithms in the Detection of Scoliosis and Spondylolisthesis from X-Ray Images

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The spine is composed of pieces of bone called vertebrae that lie between the skull and the tailbone. Various medical conditions can affect the spine. In this study, two types of degenerative diseases, scoliosis, and spondylolisthesis, were studied. Deep AI architectures have recently enabled further disease diagnosis innovation using medical images. Various traditional and deep learning studies use medical images for disease diagnosis in the literature. This study aims to classify spine X-ray images according to three possible conditions (Normal, Scoliosis, and Spondylolisthesis) and to exploit the potential of these X-ray images to detect possible diseases occurring in the spine. The performance of deep learning models and optimization algorithms used in this process was evaluated. The study uses a data set created and/or analyzed during an existing study. This data set consists of images that belong to three different classes: scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, or x-ray images of normal (i.e. healthy) individuals. A total of 338 spine X-ray images, 188 scoliosis images, 79 spondylolisthesis images, and 71 normal images. Six different deep-learning architectures have been used in the study. These architectures are Alexnet, GoogLeNet, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and EfficientNet-bo. While working on these deep architectures, each model has been evaluated using different optimization algorithms. These optimization algorithms are RmsProp, SGDM, and Adam. According to the classification processes, the deep learning model with the highest accuracy value was Alexnet, and the optimization algorithm used with it, Sgdm (99.01%), and the training time lasted 38 seconds. According to the classification processes, the deep learning model with the fastest completion time (30 seconds) was Alexnet and the optimization algorithm used with it was RmsProp. An accuracy rate of 98.02% has been obtained in the training of this model.
Funding Information
  • Inönü Üniversitesi (2)

This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit: