Has China’s Pilot Policy of Farmland Management Right Mortgage Loan Promoted County Agricultural Economic Growth?
Open Access
Abstract
Farmland mortgages are expected to drive county agricultural economic growth (CAEG) as a crucial component of furthering the reform of the rural land system and the reform of the rural financial system against the new backdrop of the new era. This study gathers panel data from 2045 Chinese counties from 2011 to 2020 and uses the difference-in-differences method and the synthetic control method to systematically examine the effects of China’s farmland management right mortgage loan (FMRML) pilot program on CAEG. The FMRML pilot program was implemented in 2016, and this research is presented as a quasi-natural experiment. The findings indicate that there is a “policy trap” and that CAEG has not been successfully promoted by the FMRML pilot program. The reason for this is because the pilot program has made county resource mismatch worse, making it unable to fully realize the promotional effect on CAEG, rather than significantly activating the three key drivers of agricultural economic growth: people, land, and money. The impact of the FMRML pilot policy on CAEG is not uniform, according to the results of the heterogeneity study, with a substantial “blocking” effect only in the central region and no significant influence in the western, northeastern, or eastern regions. The findings propose that in order to optimize agricultural mortgage policy and advance CAEG, China and other emerging nations can benefit greatly from the insights this study offers.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (22XJL011, 23JRZA527)
- Soft Science Special Project of Gansu Basic Research Plan (22XJL011, 23JRZA527)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agricultural land management and rural financial development: coupling and coordinated relationship and temporal-spatial disparities in ChinaScientific Reports, 2024
- Poverty alleviation through land assetization and its implications for rural revitalization in ChinaLand Use Policy, 2021
- A spatiotemporal analysis of county economy and the multi-mechanism process of regional inequality in rural ChinaApplied Geography, 2019
- Agricultural labor changes and agricultural economic development in China and their implications for rural vitalizationJournal of Geographical Sciences, 2019
- Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in BrazilWorld Development, 2018
- Post-disaster aid and development of the manufacturing sector: Lessons from a natural experiment in ChinaEuropean Economic Review, 2018
- Grounding the financialization of farmland: perspectives on financial actors as new land owners in rural AustraliaAgriculture and Human Values, 2016
- Property Rights and Consumption Volatility: Evidence from a Land Reform in VietnamWorld Development, 2015
- Land Property Rights and Resource AllocationThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2011
- Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from GhanaJournal of Political Economy, 1995