Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Cancer Six Months Before Death
- 1 April 2025
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in JCO Oncology Practice
- Vol. 21 (4) , 501-509
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a direct report of the patient's perspective, complementary to clinician assessment. Currently, understanding the real-time changes in PROM scores near the end of life remains limited. This study evaluated differences in mean PROM scores between patients with cancer within 6 months before death compared with surviving patients with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study uses the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive testing instruments to assess pain interference, physical function, fatigue, and depression. Patients dying within 6 months of PROM completion were selected as cases and matched to controls 1:3 by age at PROM completion, sex, cancer disease site, and cancer stage at diagnosis. Generalized estimating equation models assessed the difference in mean PROM score in cases compared with controls. RESULTS: A total of 461 cases and 1,270 controls from September 2020 to January 2023 were included. After adjustment for ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and census tract median household income, significant differences in mean scores were demonstrated. Physical function domain showed the largest difference, with cases averaging 6.52 points lower than controls (95% CI, –8.25 to –4.80). Fatigue and pain interference domains showed a rise in PROMs scores by 4.83 points (95% CI, 2.94 to 6.72) and 4.33 points (95% CI, 2.53 to 6.12), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, patients dying within 6 months of PROM completion demonstrated worse PROM scores in the four domains assessed. These findings suggest the utility of routinely collected PROMs as a real-time indicator of the terminal stage of life among patients with cancer to allow for earlier intervention with supportive oncology services.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real time patient‐reported outcome measures in patients with cancer: Early experience within an integrated health systemCancer Medicine, 2023
- Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic CancerJAMA, 2022
- Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measuresQuality of Life Research, 2021
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Routine Care Predict for Survival at Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Lung CancerClinical Lung Cancer, 2021
- Effect of Integrating Machine Learning Mortality Estimates With Behavioral Nudges to Clinicians on Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With CancerJAMA Oncology, 2020
- Characteristics of Participation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Data Capture Components of NRG Oncology Clinical TrialsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2020
- Racial differences in user experiences and perceived value of electronic symptom monitoring in a cohort of black and white bladder and prostate cancer patientsQuality of Life Research, 2020
- Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer TreatmentJAMA, 2017
- How Item Banks and Their Application Can Influence Measurement Practice in Rehabilitation Medicine: A PROMIS Fatigue Item Bank ExampleArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2011
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987