A Comparison of a Brain-Computer Interface and an Eye Tracker: Is There a More Appropriate Technology for Controlling a Virtual Keyboard in an ALS Patient?
Authors:
- Liliana GarcíaLGLiliana García
- Ricardo Ron-AngevinRRRicardo Ron-Angevin
- Bertrand LoubièreBLBertrand Loubière
- Gwendal Le MassonGMGwendal Le Masson
- 18 May 2017
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 464-473
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Usability and Workload of Access Technology for People With Severe Motor ImpairmentNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2015
- The eye-tracking computer device for communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosisActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 2013
- Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–computer interface useClinical Neurophysiology, 2010
- Which Physiological Components are More Suitable for Visual ERP Based Brain–Computer Interface? A Preliminary MEG/EEG StudyBrain Topography, 2010
- Toward enhanced P300 speller performanceJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2008
- A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performanceBiological Psychology, 2006
- Brain–computer interfaces for communication and controlClinical Neurophysiology, 2002
- What Is Usability?1993
- Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988
- Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research1988