Assessment Instruments Measuring Malingering Used With Individuals Who Have Mental Retardation: Potential Problems and Issues
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Mental Retardation
- Vol. 44 (2) , 112-119
Abstract
Malingering, the exaggeration or fabrication of physical and/or psychological symptoms, can threaten the psychological assessment process (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). To enhance the validity of psychological evaluations, researchers have studied trends in malingering and developed instruments for its detection (Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens, 1992; Tombaugh, 1996). These instruments, however, may not be appropriate for individuals with significant subaverage intellectual functioning. Four instruments assessing malingering, frequently used in forensic evaluations, were administered to individuals with mental retardation. Results show that by utilizing established cut-off scores, we were able to classify a significant percentage of participants as “malingering,” in spite of directions to perform optimally. Practical implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deception in the Interrogation Room: Sometimes Tragic for Persons With Mental Retardation and Other Developmental DisabilitiesMental Retardation, 2000
- The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals.Psychological Assessment, 1997
- The Performance of Schizophrenics on Three Cognitive Tests of Malingering, Rey 15-Item Memory Test, Rey Dot Counting, and Hiscock Forced-Choice MethodAssessment, 1996
- Assessment of Criminal-Justice-Related Competencies in Defendants with Mental RetardationThe Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1994
- Symptom validity testing and symptom retraining: Procedures for the assessment and treatment of functional sensory deficits.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979