Restoring Chaos to History: Sino-Soviet-American Relations, 1969
- 29 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The China Quarterly
- Vol. 210, 378-397
Abstract
Sino-Soviet-American relations during 1969 followed a chaotic course. Scholars have asserted in the past that the Sino-Soviet border conflict in March led to Sino-American rapprochement in December. However, evidence from China, the former socialist world and the United States undermines the interpretation of a purposeful and planned policy of any of the three actors to the others. None had a formulated policy or strategy in place. China lacked the governmental ability to chart a clear course, the United States underwent a presidential transition, and neither it nor the Soviet Union had meaningful diplomatic relations with the People's Republic. In this context, the border clashes, intended by China to reassert territorial claims on a small island, led to a complex web of actions and interactions between the three countries that was based on mutual misunderstanding, lack of communication, exaggerated threat perceptions and improvised decision making. Thus the outcome at the end of the year, the start of a friendly relationship between Beijing and Washington, was by no means the result of well-formulated and implemented policies.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. By Lorenz M. Lüthi. Princeton Studies in International History and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. xx, 375 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Maps. $27.95, paper.Slavic Review, 2009
- Strong Borders, Secure Nation2008
- The Soviet CenturyForeign Affairs, 2005
- The Flawed Architect2004
- Return to Zhenbao Island: Who Started Shooting and Why it MattersThe China Quarterly, 2001
- Re-examining the Cold War: U.S.-China Diplomacy, 1954–19732001
- The Sino-Soviet Border Clash of 1969: From Zhenbao Island to Sino-American RapprochementCold War History, 2000
- Breaking with MoscowForeign Affairs, 1985
- Strategies of ContainmentForeign Affairs, 1982
- Asia after Viet NamForeign Affairs, 1967