Using Cognitive Dissonance to Encourage Water Conservation1
Authors:
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 22 (11) , 841-854
Abstract
In a field experiment on water conservation, we aroused dissonance in patrons of the campus recreation facility by making them feel hypocritical about their showering habits. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we manipulated subjects “‘mindfulness” that they had sometimes wasted water while showering, and then varied whether they made a “public commitment” urging other people to take shorter showers. The “hypocrisy” condition‐in which subjects made the public commitment after being reminded of their past behavior‐was expected to be dissonance‐arousing, thereby motivating subjects to increase their efforts to conserve water. The results were consistent with this reasoning. Compared to controls, subjects in the hypocrisy condition took significantly shorter showers. Subjects who were merely reminded that they had wasted water, or who only made the public commitment, did not take shorter showers than control subjects. The findings have implications for using cognitive dissonance as means of changing behavior in applied settings, especially those in which people already support the desired goal, but their behavior is not consistent with those beliefs.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Taking a Closer Look: Reasserting the Role of the Self-Concept in Dissonance TheoryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a ComebackPsychological Inquiry, 1992
- Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi‐Experiment1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988
- Commitment and Voluntary Energy ConservationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976
- Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Environmental Attitudes and ActionsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1972
- Attitudes versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude ObjectsJournal of Social Issues, 1969
- Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: A clarification of the meaning of dissonance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969
- Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963
- Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959