The Ethics of Indifference
Author:
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Cultural Studies
- Vol. 6 (3) , 297-311
Abstract
Modern social theory has frequently represented city life as isolating, as degrading of social ties and as inimical to community. In another register, however, urban contexts have also been primary sites for imagining and re-imagining forms of community, especially on the basis of shared social spaces or elective identities. The discussion in this article explores this relation between solitude and community in the city. While a language of community has been important for articulating various politics of difference, I suggest that an ethics of indifference also opens up certain rights to the city. The point, however, is not simply to set a conception of indifference or anonymity against one of community or visibility, but rather to think about dissociation as a certain kind of social relation, to consider the solitude of cities as a common, if ambivalent, property. The discussion begins by addressing the nature of indifference and anonymity in urban contexts before turning to New York as the site for recent narratives of a private urban life, and a more public death, in order to explore the complex interplay of difference and indifference, community and solitude, in the city.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cosmopolitan Political Community: Why Does It Feel So Right?Constellations, 2003
- “The Right to Be Lonely”differences, 2002
- Trust and Civil Society2000
- Democracy and Difference1996
- Urbanism as a Way of Life1995
- The Sphinx in the CityFeminist Review, 1993
- Space, sexual violence and social control: integrating geographical and feminist analyses of women's fear of crimeProgress in Human Geography, 1991
- The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973