Systematic review of the feasibility of laparoscopic reoperation for early postoperative complications following colorectal surgery
- 15 February 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 104 (4) , 337-346
Abstract
Background Returning to the operating theatre for management of early postoperative complications after colorectal surgery is an important key performance indicator. Laparoscopic surgery has benefits that may be useful in surgical emergencies. This study explored the evidence for the advantages of laparoscopic reoperation. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify publications reporting the outcomes of laparoscopy as a mode of reoperation for the management of early postoperative complications of colorectal surgery. The main outcomes examined were 30-day mortality, 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay, second reoperation rate, ICU admission and stoma formation at reoperation. Results After screening 3657 citations, ten non-randomized cohort studies were identified (1137 reoperations). Laparoscopic reoperation was equivalent to or better than open reoperation, with lower rates of 30-day mortality (0–4·4 versus 0–13·6 per cent), 30-day morbidity (6–40 versus 30–80 per cent), length of stay (mean(s.d.) 15·8(2·8) versus 29·1(14·5) days), ICU admission and duration of stay in the ICU. Anastomotic leak was the most common indication, after which more patients received a defunctioning loop stoma instead of an end stoma at laparoscopic than open reoperation. Conclusion Laparoscopic reoperation is feasible in selected patients, with the advantages of improved short-term outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysisInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2014
- How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections?Colorectal Disease, 2012
- Short-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- TIME TO CUSUM: SIMPLIFIED REPORTING OF OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL SURGERYAnz Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Reoperation as a Quality Indicator in Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Is Unplanned Return to the Operating Room a Useful Quality Indicator in General Surgery?Archives of Surgery, 2001