FIRM DYNAMICS, ENDOGENOUS MARKUPS, AND THE LABOR SHARE OF INCOME
Authors:
- 11 November 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Macroeconomic Dynamics
- Vol. 19 (6) , 1309-1331
Abstract
Recent U.S. evidence suggests that the response of labor share to a productivity shock is characterized by countercyclicality and overshooting. These findings cannot be reconciled easily with existing business cycle models. We extend the Diamond–Mortensen–Pissarides model of search in the labor market by considering strategic interactions among an endogenous number of producers, which leads to countercyclical price markups. Although Nash bargaining delivers a countercyclical labor share, we show that countercyclical markups are fundamental to address the overshooting. On the contrary, we find that real wage rigidity does not seem to play a crucial role in the dynamics of the labor share of income.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endogenous Entry, Product Variety, and Business CyclesJournal of Political Economy, 2012
- Real wage rigidities and disinflation dynamics: Calvo vs. Rotemberg pricingEconomics Letters, 2011
- Redistributive shocks and productivity shocksJournal of Monetary Economics, 2010
- Unemployment Fluctuations with Staggered Nash Wage BargainingJournal of Political Economy, 2009
- Do central banks respond to exchange rate movements? A structural investigationJournal of Monetary Economics, 2007
- The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictionsJournal of Monetary Economics, 2007
- Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 2005
- Endogenous market structure and competition in the 19th century American brewing industryInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002
- Search in the labor market and the real business cycleJournal of Monetary Economics, 1995
- Monopolistic competition, increasing returns to scale, and the importance of productivity shocksJournal of Monetary Economics, 1993