How to critically appraise an article
- 20 January 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Vol. 6 (2) , 82-91
Abstract
Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology will deliver timely interpretations of key research developments, translating the latest findings into clinical practice. Our Editor-in-Chief and international Advisory Board will ensure comprehensive coverage of topical issues throughout the year, with the highest standards of editorial quality and integrity that are hallmarks of Nature Publishing Group.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesBMJ, 2007
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2006
- Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic processCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings2001
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ, 2000
- Barriers to Participation in Randomised Controlled TrialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Research, ethics and conflicts of interest.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1999
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Assessing bias in case-control studies. Proper selection of cases and controls.Stroke, 1991